July 11

PG&E To Submit Application For Federal Funds to Keep the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant Operating Past 2025

0  comments

Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant – source – Wikipedia

Utility company Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) announced on Tuesday that they will be submitting an application to receive funds from a federal government program to remain open well past the current 2025 shutdown date.

Ever since Diablo Canyon became the last active nuclear power station in California following the shut down of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station in the early 2010’s, the plant has been targeted for closure by activists. In 2016 PG&E seemingly acquiesced to the environmental and labor groups, announcing that they would be closing the final plant in 2025. However, a major need for electricity has cropped up in California caused by, among other things, shutdowns of oil, gas, and coal plants, unreliable and intermittent renewable energy, as well as the rise of electric car usage and higher temperatures causing more usage.

As Diablo Canyon provides 9% of California’s total energy production and is a clean source of energy, many have been fighting to keep the plant open. As a strain on the system has already been seen more and more, the loss of Diablo Canyon has been seen by many as a devastating blow to the state. A Stanford/MIT study released last year found that not only would an extension of Diablo Canyon’s life help California meet state climate goals, but it would serve as a bridge as renewable energy programs catch up to California’s needed energy amount. If operated to 2045, they also estimated that California would save $21 billion in system costs.

While cost and environmental concerns have dogged extension efforts, especially with many opposed, saying that keeping it open would undercut California’s renewable energy commitments, support for the extension has grown exponentially in recent years. Lawmakers from both parties have agreed that the extension is either needed or warranted, including Governor Gavin Newsom and U.S. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm.

“While California boasts a very high portion of electricity from renewable sources, California will have to boost its total renewable energy production by an enormous 20 percent in just two years to replace the clean energy being produced at Diablo Canyon,” said a letter by scientists and academics in favor of keeping Diablo Canyon to Secretary Granholm last month.

With so much support for extending the life of the plant and a quickly dwarfing opposition, PG&E took advantage of a Department of Energy extension for submissions to receive federal funds from a Biden administration program aimed at keeping energy facilities slated for closure to remain open. If Diablo Canyon gets Civil Nuclear Credit (CNC) funds, it would be highly likely that an extension would happen.

A possible life extension for Diablo Canyon

PG&E spokeswoman Suzanne Hosn said in a statement on Wednesday that “Given the revision and Newsom’s “request that we take steps to preserve Diablo as an option to promote grid reliability, we expect to submit an application for the Department of Energy funding.”

Many in favor of the 20-year extension are concerned about possible legal action from those groups that fought to end Diablo Canyon in 2016, but with federal support and lawmaker support from all levels of government, it could prove to be difficult to challenge.

“If PG&E and Diablo Canyon get those funds, it might very well be game over for anyone hoping for a 2025 end date,” explained Sal Braith, a nuclear engineer who worked at several nuclear plants in the Northeast, in a Globe interview on Wednesday. “They can’t claim costs much anymore, not with the federal government chipping it. They can’t claim the environment in many regards due to its role in helping California meet the new state drives to get rid of fossil fuel energy production. Lawmakers, both Democrats and Republicans, like it now, especially with it helping the state not face a huge energy shortfall. And more and more Californians like the idea of it too.”

“Honestly, I’d say maybe it’s time for a new plant built with lessons from previous plants, but that would have so many hurdles to it and might not even get off the ground. If we’re smart, we’ll get a twenty-year extension, but at the same time, double down on clean energy investments to keep the environmentalists happy, as well as promote job growth in renewable energy programs, as that will keep the unions happy. It’s not that easy in practice, but it is something to shoot for. For California to get out of the hole it is in with energy, Diablo Canyon is a ladder. We say no to the extension, might as well continue to try to dig our way out going straight down.”

An extension application from PG&E for funds is due to the Department of Energy by September 6th.

Stuart Turley is President and CEO of Sandstone Group, a top energy data, and finance consultancy working with companies all throughout the energy value chain. Sandstone helps both small and large-cap energy companies to develop customized applications and manage data workflows/integration throughout the entire business. With experience in implementing enterprise networks, supercomputers, and cellular tower solutions, Sandstone has become a trusted source and advisor in this space. Stuart has led the “Total Corporate Digital Integration” platform at Sandstone and works with Sandstone clients to help integrate all aspects of modern digital business. He is also the Executive Publisher of www.energynewsbeat.com, the best source for 24/7 energy news coverage and is the Co-Host of the energy news video and Podcast Energy News Beat.

Stuart is on Board Member of ASN Productions, DI Communities

Stuart is guided by over 30 years of business management experience, having successfully built and help sell multiple small and medium businesses while consulting for numerous Fortune 500 companies. He holds a B.A in Business Administration from Oklahoma State and an MBA from Oklahoma City University.


Tags


You may also like

BRICS Outshines COP29

BRICS Outshines COP29